Big money, big money. The USDA is providing a big check—to the tune of $7.7B—for conservation assistance to farmers. It’s the most the agency has ever given in a single year.
Tell us more: Beginning in FY25, $5.7B will be available for climate-smart practices (through the Inflation Reduction Act), plus an additional $2B in farm bill funding.
Background: In FY24, more than 156,485 applications were received by the Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) for conservation programs. Meanwhile, 28,500 farmers and ranchers have used these funds to apply conservation practices to 361M acres of land since 2023.
The Inflation Reduction Act had dedicated $19.5B for USDA conservation programs with an emphasis on lowering emissions and sequestering carbon. Of that, $3.8B was spent in FY24, and $9.5B will be spent by the end of FY25.
Mo’ Money, Mo’ Programs: Fourteen new practices have been added to the eligible climate-smart activities list, which now stretches more than seven pages. Grazing management to improve wildlife food and cover, brush management on arid lands, and mulching with natural materials are just a few examples.
And this: Also announced by the USDA last Wednesday were $852M in loans and loan guarantees for projects to shore up electric infrastructure and smart-grid technology in 14 states, plus another $443M for drinking water, sewage disposal, and stormwater drainage in 24 states.
Short Corn Packs a Punch
Dynamite comes in small packages—which can be true with new seed technology. What’s...
Congress to EPA: What’s Your BEEF with Meat Packers?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering new regulations that take aim at meat and poultry processors.
And some members of Congress have a BEEF with the EPA’s proposals.
The proposed rules: In late January, the EPA released the details of its proposed “Clean Water Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point source category.”
Huh?
Basically, the EPA formally published its proposals to combat wastewater contaminants that come from slaughterhouses.
Okay… that makes more sense.
At the heart of the rules proposal is a concern from environmental groups about nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants that originate from slaughterhouses. In some cases, the wastewater goes directly into waterways. In other cases, the water goes to municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
But not everyone is on board with the EPA’s suggestions…
Congress responds: Last week, two U.S. representatives—Eric Burlison (MO) and Ron Estes (KS)—pushed back against the EPA and introduced the “Banning EPA’s Encroachment of Facilities (BEEF) Act.” If passed and signed by President Biden, the law would prohibit the EPA from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the rule.
According to the lawmakers, the proposed rules place undue burden on small processors—costs that can be absorbed by larger companies.
Soundbite: “The… proposed regulation isn’t just an attack on family-run small businesses, it’s an attack on rural communities,” said Burlison. “These meat and poultry processors are the lifeblood of our communities. The BEEF Act… lets these hardworking Americans do what they do best, produce safe, affordable food for our families.”
University of Illinois Makes Big Mooves in Milk Production
Pump it up: Scientists led by Matt Wheeler at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign are...