Ag and biofuel groups sent up smoke signals in an outcry against the EPA’s final ruling for vehicle emissions. The groups say the final rule gears up electric vehicles and hangs renewable fuels out to dry.
The rule: The tighter emissions standard still allows manufacturers to produce gas-powered cars. But in order to meet the final rule, the industry would need 56% of new vehicle sales to be electric and 13% to be hybrids.
The EPA also says the new rule would bring lower healthcare costs, fewer deaths, and lower fuel, maintenance, and repair costs.
By the numbers:
- The rule could push more than ⅔ of the U.S. market to EVs by 2032
- New standards would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 7.2B metric tons through 2055
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln noted the policy could reduce the price of corn by 50%
Ag outcry: Industry groups say the new ruling pushes biofuels to the side. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln research says the drop in corn demand from the rule could cause the top five corn-producing states to lose over $100B in farmland value.
Iowa senator Chuck Grassley noted his disapproval, pointing to a potential increase in the deficit. The Congressional Budget Office’s 10-year economic outlook took into account EV tax claims and a drop in gas revenue—yielding a $224B increase in the cumulative deficit.
Soundbite: “The American taxpayers have not voted for and can’t afford the EPA’s tailpipe standards.” — Grassley
No Dairy Industry FOMO on FMMO
The 1930s have been calling—and they want their dairy challenges back. More than 180...
Going Green v. Going Green: The Atrazine Debate
The EPA has put atrazine on the chopping block (well… at least on the trimming table). And many...
More Yield, Same Fields: Brazilian Beans
In Brazil, soybeans are big business. Supplying 40% of global demand, Brazil is key to this...