Proposed updates for livestock disaster assistance are causing a stampede of support.
LIP needs TLC: The Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) administers payments to livestock producers who experience livestock losses through natural disasters, predators, or disease. Producers are paid 75% of fair market value for losses.
However, the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) only updates prices annually. In March, U.S. senators Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced the LIP Payment Improvement Act to update payments quarterly to better reflect market conditions.
Soundbite: “South Dakota farmers and ranchers work hard to produce quality livestock. Unfortunately, extenuating circumstances such as severe weather or disease can deplete their herds and, as such, hurt their operations. These producers deserve to be paid a fair and updated market price for their livestock when tragedy strikes.” — U.S. Senator Mike Rounds
Many groups have championed the bill, saying it’s a necessary update to a vital safety net for producers.
Roll call: Agriculture and livestock stakeholders, such as the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, as well as South Dakota groups, including the South Dakota Farmers Union, South Dakota Stockgrowers Association, South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association, and South Dakota Farm Bureau, came out in support of the bill.
In May, Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-IA) introduced the bill that was included in the House’s version of the farm bill, which has been passed out of committee. Meanwhile, the Senate’s version still awaits markup before it advances to the Senate floor.
Short Corn Packs a Punch
Dynamite comes in small packages—which can be true with new seed technology. What’s...
Congress to EPA: What’s Your BEEF with Meat Packers?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering new regulations that take aim at meat and poultry processors.
And some members of Congress have a BEEF with the EPA’s proposals.
The proposed rules: In late January, the EPA released the details of its proposed “Clean Water Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point source category.”
Huh?
Basically, the EPA formally published its proposals to combat wastewater contaminants that come from slaughterhouses.
Okay… that makes more sense.
At the heart of the rules proposal is a concern from environmental groups about nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants that originate from slaughterhouses. In some cases, the wastewater goes directly into waterways. In other cases, the water goes to municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
But not everyone is on board with the EPA’s suggestions…
Congress responds: Last week, two U.S. representatives—Eric Burlison (MO) and Ron Estes (KS)—pushed back against the EPA and introduced the “Banning EPA’s Encroachment of Facilities (BEEF) Act.” If passed and signed by President Biden, the law would prohibit the EPA from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the rule.
According to the lawmakers, the proposed rules place undue burden on small processors—costs that can be absorbed by larger companies.
Soundbite: “The… proposed regulation isn’t just an attack on family-run small businesses, it’s an attack on rural communities,” said Burlison. “These meat and poultry processors are the lifeblood of our communities. The BEEF Act… lets these hardworking Americans do what they do best, produce safe, affordable food for our families.”
University of Illinois Makes Big Mooves in Milk Production
Pump it up: Scientists led by Matt Wheeler at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign are...