The Future of Soybean Farming by Meristem

Mar 12, 2024

The future of soybean farming is now. In what’s being called an “agricultural breakthrough,” the EPA has given Meristem Crop Performance a “go!” on its BIO-CAPSULE TECHNOLOGY. 

 

This tech pairs METALAXYL ST fungicide with biocontrol PREPHYTE ST. The combination will provide more effective seed protection without liquid treatments—which means co$t $avings. In fact, this new treatment could make traditional liquid treatments a thing of the past completely.

 

Soundbite: “We feel we can save American farmers up to 50% if they simply buy their soybean seed naked and treat it at the planter.” — Mitch Eviston, Meristem Founder and CEO

 

Eviston referred to metalaxyl as today’s “gold standard” fungicide for keeping multiple species of pythium and phytophthora in check.

 

One of a kind: According to Meristem, this is the first and only product U.S. soybean farmers have access to that will control damping-off diseases. This will keep the good microbes healthy and ready to protect the seed.

Big deal: The EPA’s approval is a huge deal for soybean farming domestically. Promising cost savings, higher yields, and environmental benefits, this could completely change how we grow soybeans today. Everyone is eager to hear how the technology performs this growing season.

Short Corn Packs a Punch

Short Corn Packs a Punch

Dynamite comes in small packages—which can be true with new seed technology.   What’s...

Congress to EPA: What’s Your BEEF with Meat Packers?

Congress to EPA: What’s Your BEEF with Meat Packers?

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering new regulations that take aim at meat and poultry processors.

And some members of Congress have a BEEF with the EPA’s proposals.

The proposed rules: In late January, the EPA released the details of its proposed “Clean Water Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point source category.”

Huh?

Basically, the EPA formally published its proposals to combat wastewater contaminants that come from slaughterhouses.

Okay… that makes more sense.

At the heart of the rules proposal is a concern from environmental groups about nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants that originate from slaughterhouses. In some cases, the wastewater goes directly into waterways. In other cases, the water goes to municipal wastewater treatment facilities.

But not everyone is on board with the EPA’s suggestions…

Congress responds: Last week, two U.S. representatives—Eric Burlison (MO) and Ron Estes (KS)—pushed back against the EPA and introduced the “Banning EPA’s Encroachment of Facilities (BEEF) Act.” If passed and signed by President Biden, the law would prohibit the EPA from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the rule.

According to the lawmakers, the proposed rules place undue burden on small processors—costs that can be absorbed by larger companies.

Soundbite: “The… proposed regulation isn’t just an attack on family-run small businesses, it’s an attack on rural communities,” said Burlison. “These meat and poultry processors are the lifeblood of our communities. The BEEF Act… lets these hardworking Americans do what they do best, produce safe, affordable food for our families.”