The FAFSA Simplification Act, which passed in December 2020, is creating complexities that concern college-bound farm kids.
The previous FAFSA process didn’t take into account the value of family farms or the net worth of small businesses employing fewer than 100 people. But the new FAFSA includes a question regarding these values. Ultimately, how farm kids answer this new “Question #22” on the FAFSA form could reduce the financial aid they’re eligible for—and potentially make them less likely to attend college.
FAFSA on farms: The change in rules could change how much farm families have to pay for tuition: for example, an Iowa farm family making $60K a year would have paid $7,600 towards annual tuition under the old rules. Under the new framework, that number could jump to $41,000 annually. Some say the new FAFSA question doesn’t take into consideration the illiquid nature of farm assets compared to traditional investments.
Soundbite: “[The FAFSA asset question] fundamentally misunderstands how farm families operate, as the stream of revenue for crops and livestock varies significantly year-over-year, and assets cannot be cashed out to support a loan in the same capacity as traditional investments,” wrote 14 senators in a letter to the Education Department.
Firm on FAFSA: A spokesman for the Education Department noted that its job is to implement the Congress-passed bipartisan legislation, including changes that impact family farms. The agency has also noted that machinery debt and the value of farm families’ homes can be subtracted from the farms’ net worth.
Short Corn Packs a Punch
Dynamite comes in small packages—which can be true with new seed technology. What’s...
Congress to EPA: What’s Your BEEF with Meat Packers?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering new regulations that take aim at meat and poultry processors.
And some members of Congress have a BEEF with the EPA’s proposals.
The proposed rules: In late January, the EPA released the details of its proposed “Clean Water Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point source category.”
Huh?
Basically, the EPA formally published its proposals to combat wastewater contaminants that come from slaughterhouses.
Okay… that makes more sense.
At the heart of the rules proposal is a concern from environmental groups about nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants that originate from slaughterhouses. In some cases, the wastewater goes directly into waterways. In other cases, the water goes to municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
But not everyone is on board with the EPA’s suggestions…
Congress responds: Last week, two U.S. representatives—Eric Burlison (MO) and Ron Estes (KS)—pushed back against the EPA and introduced the “Banning EPA’s Encroachment of Facilities (BEEF) Act.” If passed and signed by President Biden, the law would prohibit the EPA from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the rule.
According to the lawmakers, the proposed rules place undue burden on small processors—costs that can be absorbed by larger companies.
Soundbite: “The… proposed regulation isn’t just an attack on family-run small businesses, it’s an attack on rural communities,” said Burlison. “These meat and poultry processors are the lifeblood of our communities. The BEEF Act… lets these hardworking Americans do what they do best, produce safe, affordable food for our families.”
University of Illinois Makes Big Mooves in Milk Production
Pump it up: Scientists led by Matt Wheeler at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign are...